Adrianzén Alberto M.
A democracy is one capable of holding within it a plurality of positions, actors and interests. However, for this plurality serve to strengthen, stabilize and strengthen that democracy must have also the capacity for dialogue and compromise. Ramiro's famous aphorism that Prialé saying "talk is not to agree" can also be read as an expression of the enormous difficulty of reaching agreements and arrangements, as politics is not just talk.
Turning to our recent electoral process could be said that the above statement is evident in two important messages to the voters: a) the promise is fulfilled, ie that is agreed with the voters, and b) that politicians reach agreements. However, there is a section on the right, and here I include some media, which is said to talk, discuss or agree is an expression of traditional politics. Call this "cubileteo" or "negotiations under the table." Even claim that seek impunity or protection of politicians. These and other statements, in fact, are amusing because they are the same groups that have spent their lives "goblet" and negotiating themselves "under the table" to precisely exclude, not talk and do not agree among different sectors and / or different.
It's like saying democracy we practice only "we" "others" have the right to negotiate or compromise, leaving them to obey. That, simply put, has been a bit of our history. There is a group that only wants to send and has consistently refused to compromise with the "other." Today we face the possibility of finding a way to free us from this old problem. The idea of \u200b\u200bagreeing on a government program, such as Ollanta Humala has raised these days, between different social and political forces is that possibility. But it is also possible, as I said Valentín Paniagua in his first speech as president, to inaugurate a long democratic cycle. The cycle closing condition is that the authoritarian Fujimori opened the coup on April 5, 1992 and who now wish to perpetuate. An example is the recent rumors of an amnesty for the dictator Alberto Fujimori.
know that this is not easy. And while authoritarianism is not only expression to Fujimori we know that it is he who represents him politically. I recommend looking at the Facebook page, "Democratic Shame" so they can realize what is at stake. As an example of authoritarianism, which is both racist and to say, fascism-then transcribe some of these phrases: "Indian son of a bitch bastard asshole cholo" or "my eyes fill with tears I can not believe it ... no hope ... they are the worst election results I received ... sadly I tend to agree that we need a Pinochet, "or" APRA, Alan! This time I agree to do fraud. Please, "or this other sentence is a twitter" it is better to pay the fine to your employee to give one vote to Ollanta.
Even a recent interesting article by Nelson Núñez V. ("The debate between Parker and Tapia") that assumes the defense of Carlos Tapia, states: "A subject that was added during the night (referring to the controversy) was the appearance of a Facebook account where published the home address of Carlos Tapia, and several put things like "a patriot who was looking to send a bomb to Humala's party headquarters! Peru will be rewarded as a hero! "Or" a bloody terrorist recycling, as people accompanying Humala and many more. "
know that the road to an agreement between different is not easy. Not because it is paved with good intentions but rather because it is full of racism, authoritarianism, suspiciousness and people who just want to send.
Turning to our recent electoral process could be said that the above statement is evident in two important messages to the voters: a) the promise is fulfilled, ie that is agreed with the voters, and b) that politicians reach agreements. However, there is a section on the right, and here I include some media, which is said to talk, discuss or agree is an expression of traditional politics. Call this "cubileteo" or "negotiations under the table." Even claim that seek impunity or protection of politicians. These and other statements, in fact, are amusing because they are the same groups that have spent their lives "goblet" and negotiating themselves "under the table" to precisely exclude, not talk and do not agree among different sectors and / or different.
It's like saying democracy we practice only "we" "others" have the right to negotiate or compromise, leaving them to obey. That, simply put, has been a bit of our history. There is a group that only wants to send and has consistently refused to compromise with the "other." Today we face the possibility of finding a way to free us from this old problem. The idea of \u200b\u200bagreeing on a government program, such as Ollanta Humala has raised these days, between different social and political forces is that possibility. But it is also possible, as I said Valentín Paniagua in his first speech as president, to inaugurate a long democratic cycle. The cycle closing condition is that the authoritarian Fujimori opened the coup on April 5, 1992 and who now wish to perpetuate. An example is the recent rumors of an amnesty for the dictator Alberto Fujimori.
know that this is not easy. And while authoritarianism is not only expression to Fujimori we know that it is he who represents him politically. I recommend looking at the Facebook page, "Democratic Shame" so they can realize what is at stake. As an example of authoritarianism, which is both racist and to say, fascism-then transcribe some of these phrases: "Indian son of a bitch bastard asshole cholo" or "my eyes fill with tears I can not believe it ... no hope ... they are the worst election results I received ... sadly I tend to agree that we need a Pinochet, "or" APRA, Alan! This time I agree to do fraud. Please, "or this other sentence is a twitter" it is better to pay the fine to your employee to give one vote to Ollanta.
Even a recent interesting article by Nelson Núñez V. ("The debate between Parker and Tapia") that assumes the defense of Carlos Tapia, states: "A subject that was added during the night (referring to the controversy) was the appearance of a Facebook account where published the home address of Carlos Tapia, and several put things like "a patriot who was looking to send a bomb to Humala's party headquarters! Peru will be rewarded as a hero! "Or" a bloody terrorist recycling, as people accompanying Humala and many more. "
know that the road to an agreement between different is not easy. Not because it is paved with good intentions but rather because it is full of racism, authoritarianism, suspiciousness and people who just want to send.
0 comments:
Post a Comment