Juan de la Puente
Mario Vargas Llosa
has deconstructed the electoral dilemma vs AIDS. cancer who coined to symbolize the political center which sank on 10 April. What makes it perhaps because it was always assumed a figure of evil irreversible idea that a libertarian as he rejects a false dilemma paralyzing political action. Replaced it with another dilemma, resolvable, ethical and earth, between an absolute evil, dictatorship, and poor on the other hand full of suspicion and temptations, including the authoritarian drift.
MVLL put in trouble the second time in 20 years, that political and business elite who sailed the decade of democracy with the liberal banner. With it they were very easy to support Toledo against Garcia in 2001 against Humala and Garcia 2006. However, in this election, with sharper ideological choices were using the same emblem for opting against Humala in the name of freedom. Vargas Llosa has cut off the route.
MVLL
's reference to Sartre in his speech in Buenos Aires is not free. In Sartre, man is conscious of his freedom as a value in itself and not granted. In relation to this not in vain the French distinguished the anguish of fear for him, and paralyzing fear is individual, whereas anxiety is creative, collective and forced to choose.
's reference to Sartre in his speech in Buenos Aires is not free. In Sartre, man is conscious of his freedom as a value in itself and not granted. In relation to this not in vain the French distinguished the anguish of fear for him, and paralyzing fear is individual, whereas anxiety is creative, collective and forced to choose.
It appears that as 20 years ago these elites will abandon their liberalism Vargas Llosa and inappropriate, perhaps because they are less liberal than they thought or because they were always, with exceptions, the Peruvian right conservative, and generally patrimonial mercantilist, who enjoys economic freedom but political freedom neglects or ruthlessly slaughtered.
As 20 years ago, lost the opportunity to generate a proper motion emancipated from economic power, located in society and not just the managers. At that time, a small liberal group was worth the side of freedom and MVLL while most enlisted in the authoritarian and anti-politics. Some castaways reliberalizaron that generation, but the rest continued their journey.
Now MVLL with ethical liberalism, the liberalism can only triggers a new diaspora. It is sad that, just as it is strange that the decade democratic parties, but did not produce anti-party, our strong market produces so few liberals.
Updated:
Here a note of José Alejandro Godoy surprise layoffs on Canal N and the shift of Trade group to the Fujimori.
0 comments:
Post a Comment