Extreme Pain In Big Toe

Tumbala! requires the mayor to "portray" the Tower Cajasol

PRESS RELEASE

Sevilla, May 11, 2011

Yesterday I did the PP, Zoido, who reviewed building permits

against this skyscraper platform, Tumbala!, Requires all candidates to govern Sevilla to speak out clearly about what to do about the same in case of mayors. Because, until now, there has been too much ambiguity, if not resounding silence in the case of an act so shocking, controversial, and with so serious loopholes.

Tumbalá! publicly his satisfaction with the statements that you PP mayor made on the draft Cajasol Tower, yesterday at the Forum Europe in Madrid. Zoido because the candidate agrees that if the mayor of Seville after the forthcoming local elections, review of licenses for construction by not having all warranties and be of very dubious legality.

these considerations coincide with repeated lawsuits and citizen media of this platform in recent years, given the numerous and serious irregularities in the approval of this project by the City. Irregularities to be found in the "Black Book of Cajasol Torre, prepared at the initiative the group Manifesto against the construction of the Tower Cajasol of professionals and experts in urban planning, building and legislation, and which in its day was given widespread, also among those responsible for political parties. ( Here accessible both to its conclusions as to the full document.)
Read More

But is that, in addition, urban development is a very serious attack on the cultural heritage and landscape of our city. Seriously worsen traffic conditions on major roads knots around the metropolitan area Seville. It is totally unnecessary, in that not just lack office space in our city (today there are already some 200,000 m2 unemployed). And it is economically and ethically feasible: it comes at a time of deep crisis, and in which Cajasol was "diluted" by merging with several other banks as a "Banking Civic asking the state more than 800 million euros to while pretending to be spent half in a tower perfectly dispensable.

On the eve of the topic is again dealt with by UNESCO in Paris next month, with the risk that the assets currently Seville declared "World Heritage" may become a listed as "heritage in danger" by sheer stubbornness, pride and interests of a few, we require all applicants to occupy the City Hall to speak out publicly and clearly about their position on this issue.

Citizens of Seville are entitled to know what steps to take and promote each candidate's access to city government, for urban action and public debate as indicated.

Related Links:

ABC Sevilla:

Zoido announces to review the license of the Pelli tower

The Economist:

The PP doubt the legality and economic viability of the Tower Cajasol
Correo de Andalucía:

Zoido, and doubts about Tablada and Pelli Tower of Cajasol

Zoido says it will review the license of the Pelli tower if it reaches the Mayor
World:

Zoido campaigns in Madrid
Diario de Sevilla:

Political and business clothe the candidate
Reason:

Zoido is "shudders" to another pact PSOE-IU

Nadine Jansene Housebreak

NOTE ON A RECENT DEBATE ABOUT THE TRUTH AND MEMORY: THE NOBEL AND THE CARDINAL

THE NOBEL AND THE CARDINAL

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

The final chapter of Mario Vargas Llosa published in El Pais - titled The moment of truth - is a new chapter in the debate acid which stars the award-winning writer and Cardinal Cipriani about the historical truth regarding the attitude of the latter over the defense of human rights during internal armed conflict and the links with the Archbishop of Fujimori's authoritarian regime. The author of The Feast of the Goat wrote the note in response to an article published a week before Cipriani in Trade, entitled The inalienable human rights, in which the Cardinal tries to justify the famous phrase offensive who ran against Coordinator of Human Rights in times when his tenure as bishop of Ayacucho; in the same letter, Cipriani says he opposed the sterilization forced committed by the Fujimori government. Vargas Llosa replica strongly from the first line of text, presenting with sturdy clear their views on the topic of the text and the character in question:

"Although I am not a believer, I have many Catholic friends, priests and laity, and a great respect for those trying to live according to their religious convictions. Cardinal Juan Luis Cipriani, archbishop of Lima, however, seems to represent the worst tradition of the Church , authoritarian and obscurantist of the Index, Torquemada, the Inquisition and grills for the heretic and apostate, and his recent self-defense, The inalienable human rights, published on 1 May in Lima, all the criticism justified in the name of democracy and human rights, and often receives, mainly from the more liberal Catholic circles. "

Indeed, The inalienable rights of self-defense is a text which, among other things, aims to show that the famous rudeness was not directed at human rights, but Coordinator, an organization bringing together different institutions that defend human rights in times of violence. The writer wants to show - although that was the case - the sentence context could not find any happy or lucky, because it is used to reject a particular social embodiment of defending human rights through an organization that played a important role in an era of cruelty and indolence. A time when the state did not perceive the protection of human rights victims as a priority cause, or watched with evident suspicion.

"In his text (Cipriani) that denies ever saying that" human rights are a lunacy "(expletive Peruvian English equivalent of crap) and asserts that, in fact, who applied such rudeness was only Coordinator of Human Rights, an institution run by a former English nun, Pilar Coll, during the years of mass killings committed by the Fujimori dictatorship carried out an admirable campaign denouncing the crimes, torture and Disappearance that were committed under the pretext of the fight against Sendero Luminoso. ( The Commission of Truth , who chaired the former rector of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru , Salomon Lerner, has documented these atrocities). "

is true that in the Final Report of the TRC can find information about the negative disposition of the ecclesiastical authorities of Ayacucho in the defense of human rights undertaken by these institutions as well as with regard to blocking actions the Archdiocesan Office of Social Action Ayacucho Charles Schmidt [1] and CEAS itself (organ of the Catholic Church). As the issue is controversial and generates passion, I suggest that the reader is referred to the documentary sources that the TRC itself evokes IF - you can find precise references there - to form their own opinion on the facts the report describes and supporting the claims of Vargas Llosa in this particular topic. However, the work of the Coordinating and management Pilar Coll have been highlighted in various publications and forums. Vargas Llosa's point about the NHRC is quite clear and documented. It is true that the press Fujimori and ultraconservative sector of the political class tends to slide the offensive suggestion that the Coordinator "did not address the rights of all", but this is a wrong that can not withstand the most scrutiny. Any objections in this area should strive to support your position with reasoning and verifiable historical data for the discussion can be fruitful and transparent.

Líneas abajo, el novelista enfoca su alegato en el tema de las esterilizaciones forzadas:

“El cardenal Cipriani desmiente, además, que durante la dictadura hubiera guardado silencio frente a uno de los crímenes colectivos más abyectos cometidos por Fujimori y sus cómplices: la esterilización, mediante engaños, de unas 300.000 campesinas a las que, por orden del dictador, los equipos del Ministerio de Salud ligaron las trompas o castraron, asegurándoles que se trataba de simples vacunas or a measure that only temporarily prevent them from conceiving. How come nobody learned in Peru that the archbishop had found objectionable to these abuses? Because instead of protesting publicly simply do it in private, that is, quietly whispering their protest at the pinna of the dictator! ".

Vargas Llosa focuses on the theme of supporting the cause Fujimori receive from different characters associated with religious conservatism in the current election campaign. Considered a contradiction that the Cardinal told not to intervene in the political debate expressing your opinion (and inviting others to share their case) and - in their view - their own bishop to do the same, speaking on political issues from the pulpit or showing gestures that have a clear political reading of such election. Similarly, and in a different order of reflection, regret that some politicians who are both Catholic militants - specifically, Martha Chavez, one of the visible heads of Fujimori - to commit to a political perspective, contrary to the balance of power and autonomy the judiciary (which was rife in the nineties).

"The cardinal is not usually so discreet when it comes to protest against condoms and not to mention abortion, or, for that matter, against who in this second round of elections in Peru support to Ollanta Humala. For example, for having done it, so I was warned loud and all the way from the pulpit of the Cathedral of Lima, for a trade. He has asked me "more seriously" and has claimed that how dare I give advice on who to vote for the Peruvians. The cardinal is nervous and forget that there is still freedom in Peru and that any citizen can comment on policy without asking him or anyone else. (Of course things will change if elected Ms. Fujimori, the candidate for whom he blessed in that same office in which forbade me say).

not only the Archbishop of Lima is exceeded in these days of campaigning and dirty war in Peru. An openly Fujimori, also of Opus Dei, like Bishop Cipriani, Martha Chavez, the president has publicly threatened the judiciary, Dr. César San Martín, an eminent jurist who presided over the court that sentenced to 25 years in prison for Fujimori for crimes against human rights, with the prophetic phrase: "It will respond in due course."

The written exchange has been remarkably strong. On Monday, Cardinal Cipriani has responded tersely to the writer. He pointed to Trade that each should be kept in the area of \u200b\u200bits activity, and, surprisingly, has drawn attention to the agnosticism of Vargas Llosa. "I think everyone is in place. I am the Cardinal and the Archbishop of Lima, he is a Nobel Prize for Literature. If you leave our site, we were wrong. He says he is a believer and I think that's enough. Thank you very much. " Can not understand what mean invoking any of the two characters "dislodge" perhaps allude to what a novelist should deal only with literary fiction? Would you be suggesting that a non-believer should not intervene in an issue that has theological elements? None of this is unclear. Nor is understood in what sense could be relevant for this discussion the fact that Vargas Llosa does not believe, especially if the issue of truth is an issue that - as has been noted many times - of equal interest to believers and nonbelievers. The question of reconstructing the history of the conflict is not a religious issue , public ethics concerns and involve all citizens. Vargas Llosa, like any citizen, is entitled to make public their thinking and political actions - including supporting a candidate - as well as any other citizen to disagree with using the channels that a democratic society provides for it. And those who disagree with him, can do the same. That is the dynamics of a democratic society. This is a horizontal space, symmetrical, no one is excluded in advance of civic debate and the only authority that can be invoked inside is the best argument.

Anyway. What we do have clear is that it is highly likely that this debate will continue in other ways. Either way, this uneven exchange of opinions and reasons put back on the table - perhaps in some cases reluctantly, ethical and political importance of the issue of recovery of memory in our country. One issue that has been condemned to silence by an important sector of the self-styled "elite", who prefers to leave things as they are under the clumsy name of "look to the future."

Updated:

Aldo's comment Mariátegui against Vargas Llosa's article boasts a huge bad faith. For a change, attributed to writer "miscalculation."

Jules Favre's article published today in Mail (12 / 5 / 2011) does not deserve further comment. Confuses criticism with personal attacks. It is not news.

---

[1] Commission Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Peru), Final Report of the Commission of Truth and Reconciliation Volume III, p. 292.

Fun Sorority Awards Examples

DE SOTO AND THE PREACHING OF MODERNITY UNILATERAL

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

As the campaign progresses and becomes warm, strangely positions show "novel" - Keiko Fujimori apologizes for crimes committed since Fujimori, Rolando Sousa Report commends passages TRC and argues that the candidate could commit in writing not pardon his father -. Later, the waters return to their level: are released Carlos Raffo's views on a possible - for Fujimori, "necessary" - release of Fujimori, Keiko avoid ruling on such a written commitment suggested by Sousa, noting that he had pledged his word on the subject, and intimating that it would not sign any documents.

few days ago, Hernando de Soto - brand new collaborator of the "technical team" Fujimori's candidacy - had more of a controversial intervention in the program Time N Jaime de Althaus. Asked about the raid that ended with the death of Osama Bin Laden, de Soto - displaying a downright twisted irony - argued that these facts were clear that Peru was a "civilized country." While in the United States authorities and people celebrated the elimination of a terrorist leader in the country - indicated - to terrorists were captured, they were read their rights, they are processed, and their sentences, they were left free. Even said that "we put in our memory" (sic) on an "equal with the military" (slipping a malicious criticism and full of falsehood and prejudice against the TRC). Finished directing a sarcastic smile the journalist, who - stunned - he replied with a nervous smile. Wow, I knew that Hernando de Soto had no qualms about working with dictatorial regimes - Gaddafi, Mubarak, Fujimori - but this mocking excursus on the treatment of criminals What was surprising was suggesting de Soto with a smile? A thing down an offender as part of a confrontation and another extrajudicial execution. There are those who declare their devotion to the modernization of the economy, but fall within the cavernous idea that only the decent and the innocent are authentic bearers of human rights (see in a similar vein - but infinitely more gross and grotesque - the position of businessman Julio Favre in this offensive article in Mail. A text regrettable, fascist).

These controversial statements of Hernando de Soto show that professes a monochromatic one-dimensional conception of modernity. It seems ignore the value of indigenous cultural identities around their connections with nature: believes that native citizens of the Amazon burning with desire to obtain title to make business decisions on their land. His theory works as a Procrustean bed that lethal sawed everything that does not comply with its conditions. Even he said - to the dismay of Jaime de Althaus - that bin Laden was captured by the degree. His views on human rights issues are always controversial because of his undisguised conservatism in the matter. His "liberalism" is hemiplegic (and therefore false ). While denouncing Vargas Llosa the coup of April 5, Hernando de Soto worked with the drafting of the Fujimori coup speech in The Bahamas.

The strange position of Hernando de Soto about human rights issues is relatively well known. He had earlier expressed his irritation against the TRC Report , without showing a minimum reading of the text, sliding the idea - for other ridiculous - that Commission consisted of a " enormous amount of ex-guerrillas or people involved in violence " . Soto seems to feel quite comfortable with the political group that currently works.

Careers Money Power Important

MEMORIES OF THE FUTURE (Nelson Manrique)

Nelson Manrique

an operation is under way on the right to try to clean the image of Keiko Fujimori, distancing from his famous father. It has been decided to remove his father's government claim as "the best of Peru's history," his declaration that would shake the hand not to be amnestied and their involvement in acts of corruption, among other things, allowed to fund their studies and those of his brothers with dirty money Fujimori and Montesinos there. But the past stubbornly refuses to die, and returns again and again despite the make-up operation.

Yesterday marked 19 years for the kidnapping and murder of nine peasants in the district of Santa, Chimbote. Colina Group members raided several houses that day in human settlements La Huaca, Javier Heraud and San Carlos, beat and kidnapped the peasants and the rose trucks. Do not ever see them again. They were not terrorists but unionists, as told by Jesus Sosa Saavedra, a member of the Colina Group, known as "Kerosene" by his friends, for his habit of burning their victims with this fuel, "" It was a particular job because Mr. Fung was a friend of Major General Hermoza EP, which had properties in Chimbote ... and say that these people were workers of a cotton company and they were making problems in the company, so I wanted to involve them in subversive "(Ricardo Uceda. Death on the Pentagonito. The burial secrets of the Peruvian Army, 2004). In 1995, Colina Group members were granted amnesty by Alberto Fujimori. He defended the amnesty in Parliament Rafael Rey, now a member of Fujimori's presidential plate and sworn enemy of the TRC and the Place of Memory, the same as now, when polls show is losing, Keiko promises to build.

last week renewed the Interpol international arrest warrant against 14 members of the entourage of Alberto Fujimori committed several acts of corruption, including theft of state resources, complicity in illegal activities using the intelligence apparatus of the SIE to commit murder , kidnapping, espionage, wiretapping, among other illegal operations, and arms trafficking, including the purchase of 36 aircraft corrupt war MiG-29 and Su-25 fouled in Belarus for the FAP, which cost the lives of several Peruvian pilots. It has a prominent place among the refugees Victor Aritomi, Keiko uncle, husband of his father's sister Rosa Fujimori and former Peruvian ambassador to Japan, a position from which played a key role in mounting the mafia network of the imperial family. Hildebrandt in his thirteen brings an excellent report about the theft-established by the Comptroller-investigations of several million dollars from the Japanese donations mounted by Rosa Fujimori and Aritomi under the command of Alberto Fujimori. Report these events cost sequestration and torture of Susana Higuchi, who in these circumstances was denied by their children Keiko and Kenji.

certainly could not miss at this juncture intelligence operatives in the style of Montesinos. The newspaper First has issued a detailed report on the "Savannah Plan", mounted to prevent Ollanta Humala comes to power (http:www.diariolaprimeraperu.com/online/noticia.php?IDnoticia=85082 ). The report includes names of people involved, facts, addresses and photographs of the operation mounted by the command Fujimori with the complicity of the intelligence services of the armed forces, the involvement of prominent businessmen who finance operating and incorporating characters such as Jaime Bayly and Hernando de Soto, who returns to work with Fujimori after providing their valuable services to various dictatorships in the world, including Qaddafi, for whom he worked until two months ago. Nothing like De Soto to strengthen the democratic profile of Fujimori.

(Posted Republic)

Updated:

Hernan Carlos Raffo Migoya: "confided that, although never admit it in an interview, the first Force will make 2011 his party came to power in these election will, of course!, release from prison the sentenced Alberto Fujimori, as is. "(5/4/2011).

Where are the" oaths "Keiko Fujimori?

How Much Is A Desert Eagle

WATCH AREAS OF POLICY AND CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION IS

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

Identification injustice of active and passive recognition of injustice are ethical operations involve a provision for reflection and critical examination that allows citizens to remain alert to the weaknesses of the institutions and their representatives, but this hexis also lets you take vigilant and severe position regarding its own weaknesses in the control of political power and compliance with the requirements of justice. The engaged citizen knows that - as Hegel would say - there is no master without a slave, is aware that corruption and the injury of rights can only take place with the assistance of indifference or complicity of the agents.

In this sense, the anti-corruption initiatives that arise from the political system - the state itself and even political parties are in election race - are insufficient, although expression of true and viable proposals in practice if they do not cost the support of active citizenship. Indeed, state institutions need to formulate the conditions and rules to ensure transparency and probity in procurement, tendering and recruitment of people who exercise positions in the public sector. Similarly, Parliament is required in that members can monitor management authorities have chosen. We need public - as the People's Advocate, which devoted full time to defending the basic rights of individuals. However, the existence of public institutions and control mechanisms can not substitute for a vigilant citizenry. Institutions and mechanisms could eventually be corrupted by power, if agents are not involved in the dynamics of political life, understood in terms of everything that is associated with matters of common interest.

This perspective returns us to some extent the concept former citizenship, which referred not only to "owner of rights" but strictly political agent. Aristotle held that the citizen ( polites ) was one that both governs and is governed [1] . It ruled because it obeys the rules they have established their representatives, and stood by the decisions that have been taken in the agora, the area of \u200b\u200bcommon discussion. But also participates in the government intervenes decisively in the process of election of officers and the public debates that have resulted in the enactment or repeal of laws and agreements on public policy. The city - even in the context of modern representative democracies - can become co-author of the law , can mobilize with others to introduce new issues into the public agenda, it can monitor and supervise the management of the authorities.

A strong sense of public deliberation requires common spaces, both within the political and civil society (universities, professional associations, unions, trade unions, NGOs, religious communities, etc.).. These scenarios allow rational consensus building on programs that expose issues of common interest. Consensus-building has often involves significant difficulties to overcome through persuasion and the exchange of arguments. Building consensus is a fundamental activity in a republic of citizens. However, the expression of dissent is a practice no less important in a free political system. In a despotic society who disagrees is diagnosed as a "patient with ideological problems" as a subject who is a victim of false or distorted doctrine, an individual must be "corrected" by the good of his mind or his soul, even against their will. Historical examples are legion (the Inquisition in medieval Christianity and Baroque, Fascist and Communist regimes, etc.).. In a democratic society, in contrast, who disagrees is an interlocutor in a dialogue about what is good and better for citizenship, is an individual who must be heard in appeals against the floor and expressed their dissent through channels legally established. Genuine democracy appreciates and promotes fair and peaceful expression of dissent.

As we know, corruption thrives where power is concentrated, where the city tends to behave as a mere subject, and complies with laissez-faire and pass "for the conduct of the authorities in the administration of the State. Often, people tend to focus our attention on the design and implementation of our plans deprived of life, or to deploy our capabilities in the world of work and family. That this area constitutes a genuine personal fulfillment is something which nobody doubts. However, completely neglecting our responsibility to what happens on the political scene has serious implications about the distribution of power in public life (see reflections Alessandro Caviglia in this direction). As Tocqueville noted in his day, Desertion of civic life implies that the share of power that corresponds to citizens fall into the hands of rulers and political career, a situation that adorns the banquet authoritarian and creates the conditions for corruption go unpunished. As is clear, none of this happens without the consent of the individuals themselves. The viewer's perspective helps to reproduce this deplorable situation, only if the community members assume the status of political actors, corruption and violation of fundamental rights can be effectively combated.

---

[1] See Policy 1277b 10.

Wikipedia, Raylene Richards

THE CANDLESTICK (CARLOS Garatea)

Carlos Garatea

best of the first round is that results force us once again, to look and take the country as whole. Lima is Peru, and vice versa. But they also force us to recognize that suffer from ills atavistic: no memory, racism lives on the surface, lack common sense in the political class, money above human development, lying is a habit, "resiliency" a strategy coexistence, indifference and so much more can be added here that the list could easily grow. Of course there are famous and remarkable people. But these (and other) evils are in our environment. It seems that now have conspired to put us to a grim future and those who led Peru to a vicious and corrupt dictatorship again be an option for millions of people. Where was to stop the growth of Peru advertised? What grew? Are we better?

Not surprisingly, for example, that during the first stage, the candidates agree on one thing: education is wrong. Go novelty. After this match promises ripped improvement: more schools, more divers, more shoes, more poles, more computers, more technological institutes, more tests to teachers, better pay, better breakfast, new rosters and even did not miss who thinks that the solution would come from the sky, not God, who is now busier than ever with us, but a satellite launched into space. It seems absurd but that and two or three trivial promises reduced the formulary. Reduce

solutions to it not only shows the priorities or the populism that has in mind, but obviously not understanding what it is the problem. It is no longer clear that education takes place in a classroom. Nobody has mentioned. Any reform has to be incarnated in the relationship building between teacher and student. There is no education without someone to teach and no one to learn, nor are given without libraries, good books, pencils and notebooks. Few things are so obvious and fundamental as that.

All are silent how they will ensure students to complete high school with better analytical skills, with improved performance in reading comprehension or mathematical reasoning, with adequate provision to justify personal views and respect the opinions of others, with an ethical attitude that enables them to participate in a society peacefully and in solidarity, with a general culture that allows them to be located in the world and in history. They all insist on the technological dimension, but who do become concerned citizens? Why did they import the arts and humanities? If it were from the start of the campaign, from April 10 the discussion has depleted to the point that all you lose sleep is the Constitution and the continuity of the economic model. Therefore, "we must remember and insist that the country is more than the management of its economy and the welfare of their companies (...) A country's history, dignity, culture, identity and especially the future" (Masks, 14.4. 11).

Education is the future. So clear and precise. It is unacceptable that those who endorsed the killing of the Cantuta and Barrios Altos, sterilizations of poor women, the "authentic interpretation" or those involved in the purchase of journalists, judges, congressmen or who believe that only State leads to the development and deny freedom and private initiative, are they, those engaged in education morning in Peru. Do you imagine those subjects discussing the importance of ethics training or comprehensive colleges and universities? As

PUCP is backed by a long and fruitful work of recognized service to Peru, through the efforts and dedication of teachers, students and administrators, as part of a modern educational model, rooted in a comprehensive education in tolerance and freedom, just as or perhaps better, for that reason I have to insist that education is also part of the dilemma that live. The future is not confined to the behavior of the stock exchange or the exchange rate. It's so much more. Education is thus in the spotlight. Do not be naive but neither mistake again.

(Appeared on Monday in Punto Edu ).

Birthday Card Sayings For One Year Olds

19 reason to vote for Humala (Alvaro Vargas Llosa)

Alvaro Vargas Llosa

1] With Fujimori, moral learning of the ruling class in Peru, which has invested values \u200b\u200band believes that freedom and human rights are a lunacy be interrupted. Raise the banana republic.
2] With Fujimori, the "model" will be the preserve of certain hucksters: gangster commercialism is the negation of a free economy. The annual growth of democratic decade was three times higher than the 90.
3] With Fujimori will cancel the possibility that poor people regain their dignity: the method to communicate with them in the 90 was the dependency, forced sterilization, and the lime pit.
4] Under Fujimori, the terror will be installed in companies, editorial offices and courts. The firings, threats and chapters in leading media group and radio are an abracadabra Arequipa advance. The Fujimori is not an idea or project is a method. The method of Al Capone (without the detail of the cigar).
5] With Fujimori, we ensure that the Judge César San Martín, a luxury for the Judiciary, abominable suffering persecution.
6] The condition ethical, political and intellectual Fujimori Botafumeiro enough to know where should not be. For your hire economists copycats, its imported television Harlequins (with "dumping") and was thought pelafustanes cyber Borges's phrase: "He had trained in the habit of pretending that it was not someone to discover his condition as one" .
7] The candidate for first vice-president Fujimori is a coup. The candidate for second vice president is almost fascist and equally foolish. In terms of authoritarianism, "almost" is an aggravating and "dumb" redundant.
8] In countries where things are in place, not jail the inmate rules. The Diroes is now the property of the Fujimori. The danger the candidate is not released to the parent but the parent lattice to the daughter and the whole country.
9] Ollanta, there is a greater guarantee of democracy. If he commits an excess, you jump right to the neck. If Fujimori committed a crime, right applaud like seals.
10] Ollanta, the "model" might acquire more social legitimacy. There were two American events in the last decade: the expansion of the middle class and the modernization of part of the left. If Ollanta, under pressure, gives the final leap, Peru will join a list of art. The development is not possible without a left liberal.
11], and assuming Ollanta modernization definitively close the way to future populist strongmen. In Brazil, Chile, Uruguay and El Salvador, the moderate left has undermined the emergence of enlightened leaders.
12] The worst defeats of Hugo Chávez has not done the right but the left. Criticism of the Uruguayan José Mujica of Venezuela on the day of his inauguration, and now, the breaking of Paraguay Fernando Lugo in Caracas Venezuela have further isolated. Why give him Ollanta tray now that he has refused? A Latin American statesman who has to know just how secure a private meeting with a large European media group: "I know personally: Ollanta not follow Chavez line. "
13] For some difficult reforms, the left can be bolder than the right. Mujica in Uruguay has just proposed school vouchers, subsidies to educational demand, and has embraced the opening Lugo in Paraguay: thanks to foreign investors, their small country just beat Argentina's beef exports. Ricardo Lagos in Chile opened trade rather than the dictatorship of Pinochet.
14] In times of democratic resistance, I had to get to Ollanta in the hotel that served as headquarters. He and his wife wanted to be linked to the cause which led Toledo. Peru is divided between those who fought at a disadvantage by freedom and those who had been stabbed in the back. His instinct at that time was accurate border. Its serious bugs later, it paid in 2006, do not remove it.
15] The next President will touch you deal with the ruling of The Hague on the maritime dispute with Chile. If for some reason the ruling proves unfavorable to Peru, Ollanta is preferable constrained by the responsibilities of State.
16] is much more healthy to have a Alan García Ollanta making opposition to that understanding with a government of Fujimori to charge for services rendered.
17] Peru Posible, despite the contortions of these days, give the required majority Ollanta to govern. That will be one of the best guarantees that adheres to constitutional limits.
18] has emerged an opportunity to make the emergence of the fascist threat in the chance of an understanding between the left and liberals. There are historical precedents. In 1989, the coalition of conservatives and communists in Greece ended with a corrupt government. In Mexico, the PRD and the PAN's Felipe Calderón, with common applications, have ousted the PRI in several states and may be together in the presidential election. In England, Liberal Democrats (left) and moderate conservatives have avoided the continuity together.
19] Ollanta is the possibility that democracy is to straighten the Democrats twisted in these 10 years. Are responsible for this recycled entrepreneurs reporters enfeoffed the mafia, politicians allied with them to resolve their disputes with other Democrats stupid, stolen monies were not fully repatriated and many accomplices who "went piola" (for using a argentinismo) without being processed. Why did Alexis de Tocqueville: "The habit of inattention must be considered the greatest vice of democracy." If Ollanta wins, democracy be sure to pay attention in future millimeter.

(Posted Republic ).

Self Piearcng Earrings

FEAR AND SHAME THE COVENANT AS A POSSIBILITY

Gehri Gonzalo Gamio

In Much of the dilemma we face in this second round - or Humala or Dynasty Fujimori - can be described in terms of a conflict between different arguments about possible futures for the country, but also a conflict between decisions passion, which are brought into play two emotions clearly based on thoughts, beliefs and judgments, two emotions most relevant to politics. On the one hand, the fear ; the other, the shame . There are other emotions at play, no doubt, but these are particularly emblematic in these circumstances. Indeed, we fear that Ollanta Humala is using to call an important group of professionals to improve their plan of government and form a government of consensus with the real purpose of winning elections and then ignore that team and return to his program "harder." Those fears have an important place in our political debate; from reasonable doubt that inspires in us the candidate, its history, its old ties with Venezuela. Mario Vargas Llosa has said the vote for Humala from the democratic forces can not be a blank check, that citizens must be willing to leave the public space to denounce any form of violation of democratic rules. We in the trance deciding vote in that direction - not without concern and discomfort (1) - must be willing to assume the responsibility that comes with this decision and take to the streets if negates the rule of law.

At the other extreme, the Fujimori regime and its dismal record regarding the violation of law, human rights and the various cases of corruption, we thrill of shame as dominant ethic. Clearly intuit - thanks to the facts, the grim recent history of Peru - which would allow you to start taking the reins of government political group in the management of which predated state coffers, concentrated the powers and established a system of control over the media, became the destruction of public ethics in a system and a way of life, a system was strengthened through patronage, purchase of consciousness and extortion. On all these events we have evidence, and the two leaders of this criminal device - Alberto Fujimori and Vladimiro Montesinos - has been convicted and imprisoned. There is no reason to say with certainty that the new candidate has departed Fujimori really this evil legacy. Their political environment and their spokesmen (Martha Chavez, Luz Salgado, Jorge Trelles etc.) from the quarries of the authoritarian regime of his father, she has repeated on numerous occasions that the government of Alberto Fujimori has been "the best in the history of Peru, and has spoken in favor of a pardon that favor. His recent efforts to distance themselves from parental government and ask for forgiveness are shown as apparent electoral strategies. Do not believe him. Finally, the Fujimori is revamping only minimally their senior political cadres (for example, with the addition of Rafael Rey on presidential plate, and know their views on issues of justice and human rights).

recently Jaime Bayly and Aldo Mariátegui have struggled to establish a boundary between the profile of Keiko Fujimori and his father. Seek to persuade us that his government would not be a continuation of the management of his father, that his candidacy would not be a "Trojan horse" of a mob which would attempt to return to power. However, as rightly argued Gustavo Faverón , the problem of Fuerza 2011 candidate is not their genetic heritage, but its political line . Bayly and Mariátegui would have us believe, among other things, that those who govern are only individuals, which is glaringly false. The "distinction" between Fujimori and Montesinos already sounded between twisted and laughable, in the strict case of the prisoner's daughter Diroes the distinction is strange and sudden, as she has based much of his campaign in the legacy of his father (starting with the last name). Any fair delimitation would take a completely different political environment, develop a program with a different orientation (for in issues of democratic institutions and human rights is a nullity ) and assume a take away clear, transparent and truly really timely - specifying mistakes and crimes, and noting the degree of responsibility of those involved in them - and not the last game of masks time, with terse statements and smiles for the cameras, having the added indulgence of journalists. The public will have to decide very soon what weighs more on his mind, the prospect somewhat opaque to maintain current economic model, or staring in a matter of national dignity, close the doors to those who in one way or another ruled the country and plunged into the gray swamp of authoritarianism and corruption.

(The image belongs to the famous artist Alonso Núñez figure, whom we thank for granting us permission to publish).

Updated: CCN Keiko and the case (JA Godoy).

Hernan Carlos Raffo Migoya: "confided that, although never admit it in an interview, the first thing his party Fuerza 2011 will come to power in this election is, of course! , release from prison the sentenced Alberto Fujimori, either way. " (04/05/2011).

Where are the "oaths" Keiko Fujimori?

(1) And not cancel the vote, which was my original impetus to such undesirable dilemma.

I Saw Kate From Kates Playground

(ALBERTO Adrianzén)

Adrianzén Alberto M.

A democracy is one capable of holding within it a plurality of positions, actors and interests. However, for this plurality serve to strengthen, stabilize and strengthen that democracy must have also the capacity for dialogue and compromise. Ramiro's famous aphorism that Prialé saying "talk is not to agree" can also be read as an expression of the enormous difficulty of reaching agreements and arrangements, as politics is not just talk.
Turning to our recent electoral process could be said that the above statement is evident in two important messages to the voters: a) the promise is fulfilled, ie that is agreed with the voters, and b) that politicians reach agreements. However, there is a section on the right, and here I include some media, which is said to talk, discuss or agree is an expression of traditional politics. Call this "cubileteo" or "negotiations under the table." Even claim that seek impunity or protection of politicians. These and other statements, in fact, are amusing because they are the same groups that have spent their lives "goblet" and negotiating themselves "under the table" to precisely exclude, not talk and do not agree among different sectors and / or different.
It's like saying democracy we practice only "we" "others" have the right to negotiate or compromise, leaving them to obey. That, simply put, has been a bit of our history. There is a group that only wants to send and has consistently refused to compromise with the "other." Today we face the possibility of finding a way to free us from this old problem. The idea of \u200b\u200bagreeing on a government program, such as Ollanta Humala has raised these days, between different social and political forces is that possibility. But it is also possible, as I said Valentín Paniagua in his first speech as president, to inaugurate a long democratic cycle. The cycle closing condition is that the authoritarian Fujimori opened the coup on April 5, 1992 and who now wish to perpetuate. An example is the recent rumors of an amnesty for the dictator Alberto Fujimori.
know that this is not easy. And while authoritarianism is not only expression to Fujimori we know that it is he who represents him politically. I recommend looking at the Facebook page, "Democratic Shame" so they can realize what is at stake. As an example of authoritarianism, which is both racist and to say, fascism-then transcribe some of these phrases: "Indian son of a bitch bastard asshole cholo" or "my eyes fill with tears I can not believe it ... no hope ... they are the worst election results I received ... sadly I tend to agree that we need a Pinochet, "or" APRA, Alan! This time I agree to do fraud. Please, "or this other sentence is a twitter" it is better to pay the fine to your employee to give one vote to Ollanta.
Even a recent interesting article by Nelson Núñez V. ("The debate between Parker and Tapia") that assumes the defense of Carlos Tapia, states: "A subject that was added during the night (referring to the controversy) was the appearance of a Facebook account where published the home address of Carlos Tapia, and several put things like "a patriot who was looking to send a bomb to Humala's party headquarters! Peru will be rewarded as a hero! "Or" a bloody terrorist recycling, as people accompanying Humala and many more. "
know that the road to an agreement between different is not easy. Not because it is paved with good intentions but rather because it is full of racism, authoritarianism, suspiciousness and people who just want to send.

( Taken Republic)

Cervical Mucus Before Period White Milky

WAYS AROUND THE 'FAITH' IN GOD'S ECLIPSE

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

Santa Week is always an interesting time. A time of meditation. A time for reading and dialogue, if we consider that the national television films always exhibits the same period, and the Sermon on the traditional three hours - I usually hear every year - does not offer any new or insightful perspective on dialectical theology or even (perhaps pre-conciliar monologue with a little bit political and electoral much of the spirituality of Mel Gibson and no or Pagola Metz). All things considered the matter, this situation of "winter theological" - to use an expression of a very dear ecclesiological Franciscan - allows us to turn inwards, return to one's Gospel and other readings. The recent departure of our friend and teacher has given Vincent Santuca this holiday has a different key, which converge the sadness and hope.

Religion is an extraordinary form of discourse and practice that seeks to give life meaning and fulfillment. Expresses a kind of longing for transcendence that can not detract nothing more. That longing drinks from a variety of sources, the notable Christian thinker and mystic Simone Weil argued that he was built up spiritually with the Gospel reading, but also by reading the Greek classics (an idea that I share completely.) This desire is his test of authenticity in the confrontation with practice. In particular embodiment Christianity is or is not at all . It is an expression of faith and justice, and in its midst, one calls the other. Jesus of Nazareth preached a kingdom of love and forgiveness - which was noted in our midst - and accepted death on a cross in the name of the message. Who then hoisted the banner of a monolithic orthodoxy condemned him for heresy.

The significant Jewish philosopher Martin Buber has said that our age is marked by an "eclipse of God ', an experience of no significance for the presence of different images of self that obscure the possibility of a genuine encounter with divine. Recall that Buber believes that the relationship with God has the shape of the I-thou communication, early and concrete in the interpersonal encounter, the relationship between human beings of flesh and bone. Impossible not to think about the meal when you read this venerable teacher Vienna. The reasons for the eclipse, in contrast, comes from the imposition of the I-it (or I- this ), the relationship with an object or a (mere) concept. The objectification of human beings - for example, savage capitalism or the political totalitarianism of different stamp - or treatment of God or truth or representations as mere bodies, involve forms of spiritual eclipse.

Interestingly, because the eclipse is schematically identified with the "secularism" or religious skepticism, and denounce the theocon . There is a doctrinal problem can be resolved in terms of orthodoxy versus heterodoxy, eradicating heresy. Attitude is a fundamental issue, which involves "beliefs" strictly within the meaning of dispositions to act. In fact Buber notes that one of the most lethal and painful of the eclipse of God are the ways "religious" fundamentalism and fanaticism, which seeks God's face be covered with the mask of the will to power, when leadership becomes not an expression of service, but a sign of power and control over the conduct of others, when a human doctrine becomes identical to the Truth. This form of idolatry and hypocrisy replaces the love of dominion over the will the other, betrays the deep spirit of religion. Caring for the poor, the widow and the alien is replaced by the control over the consciences and bodies. This stance is at odds with the attitude of a God who is incarnate, born in a manger and died on the cross for love.

are issues to think calmly. In the Judeo-Christian religious tradition, truth can not be started without the horizon of interpersonal relationships, caring for the dignity and freedom of those who can and should tell you . When this happens, definitely something wrong.

Dillards Dance Dresses

DOUBTS AMONG AND EVIDENCE AND THE LIBERAL

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

Steven Levitsky's phrase about the terrible dilemma of second round has hit the nail. About Humala have doubts about Keiko, tests. Martha Chavez's statements on threats sliding César San Martín and the noting that the families of the victims of Cantuta virtually no would complain about (as well as allusions unacceptable Keiko Fujimori corrupt regime of his father as the "best of history, "he responded well Caretas magazine in an editorial entitled" Until just here) clearly show that Fujimori not only has not changed is willing to make some self-criticism, but remains cynical and authoritarian attitude against human rights and autonomy of powers. In the absence of conditions and trajectory for the candidate of Force 2011, would have to fear that the lines of the state administration will decide in the Diroes (Or perhaps Naval Base?). What is surprising is that much of our political class and leadership private enterprise and the media are willing to look the other way deal with this situation. They fear more doubts than certainties. Many people in these sectors would be willing to sacrifice of national dignity willingly giving the state the top mafia once it looted in the name of the alleged perspective of "economic stability." Stability should be put into question since the Fujimori regime did not scruple to interfere with the lifetime of the companies, for example, by stripping of Peruvian nationality Ivcher and snatch a place in Frecuencia Latina, or SUNAT used for purposes of political control. The defense market orthodoxy would weigh more - in the eyes of potential voters Fujimori - that the principles of public ethics and respect for fundamental rights.

The dismissal of two journalists from Canal N to enable the editorial line of this medium to support the return of Fujimori (in convergence with the conservative view has been gradually imposed the new administration Trade ) goes in this direction. IPYS and has spoken negatively about this decision violates the freedom of journalistic work. This is a shame, especially if we remember the important commitment made by the Canal N to the defense of democracy as it was the first medium to meet the citizen marches against the authoritarian regime of the pair Fujimori - Montesinos and post the video Kouri - Montesinos.

Statements of Mario Vargas Llosa about his decision to vote for Ollanta Humala has generated harsh and strange reactions. His daughter Morgan has reported being the victim of threats ("Coming from what political sector? The same group, perhaps, who attacked the memorial The crying eye?). Vargas Llosa has received countless subtle little criticism from politicians, businessmen and journalists increasingly coming to Fujimori, as Jose Barba Caballero, Julio Favre or Aldo Mariátegui. The latest to join this choir is Juan Luis Cipriani (not surprising when we remember their former sympathies Fujimori). For his part, Delgado Aparicio deplorable has written an article, full of bad intentions and qualifications against the person of Vargas Llosa. Trelles, beating and relatively more cautious, have been accused of intolerance writer, curiously, the new spokesman for Fujimori has stated in an interview that the eventual victory of Humala would seriously endanger the freedom of press and expression, when the rate of Fujimori bought consciences and editorial lines of different media, and pursued independent journalism, as has been demonstrated, the interviewer's reply was sung, but Raul Vargas said nothing.

The Fujimori bet because people do not report on what we live for some years. That we forget crimes against life and the common good, that we forget many dark paths. invite us to disregard the facts. Or that we are completely complacent with past evil and degrading civic. Some even evoke the past in a notoriously crooked: see a recent really unusual Federico Prieto Celi article in fa vor of the candidate puts Fujimori where highly controversial figures as Carlos Bologna, Jorge Camet and Juan Carlos Hurtado Miller as a kind of model of "democratic modernization." of Ripley.

crimes committed since fujimorato and are thoroughly documented. Alberto Fujimori was convicted of murder and his sentence has been ratified. The environment of the candidacy of his daughter is the same that surrounded those in power in the nineties can we close our eyes to that reality? Can we put in parentheses the principles and values \u200b\u200bthat this regime trampled on behalf of a hypothetical ' effectiveness' in the future management of the economy? These are questions that we should avoid making when we meditate on how to vote.

Updated : Article Fujimori and sewer dweller (The Mule).

Update 2: A cardinal is very orange (Augusto Alvarez Rodrich).

,

How Likely Is It To Get Hpv On Your Lip

MVLL (JUAN DE LA PUENTE)

Juan de la Puente

Mario Vargas Llosa

has deconstructed the electoral dilemma vs AIDS. cancer who coined to symbolize the political center which sank on 10 April. What makes it perhaps because it was always assumed a figure of evil irreversible idea that a libertarian as he rejects a false dilemma paralyzing political action. Replaced it with another dilemma, resolvable, ethical and earth, between an absolute evil, dictatorship, and poor on the other hand full of suspicion and temptations, including the authoritarian drift.

MVLL put in trouble the second time in 20 years, that political and business elite who sailed the decade of democracy with the liberal banner. With it they were very easy to support Toledo against Garcia in 2001 against Humala and Garcia 2006. However, in this election, with sharper ideological choices were using the same emblem for opting against Humala in the name of freedom. Vargas Llosa has cut off the route.

MVLL
's reference to Sartre in his speech in Buenos Aires is not free. In Sartre, man is conscious of his freedom as a value in itself and not granted. In relation to this not in vain the French distinguished the anguish of fear for him, and paralyzing fear is individual, whereas anxiety is creative, collective and forced to choose.

It appears that as 20 years ago these elites will abandon their liberalism Vargas Llosa and inappropriate, perhaps because they are less liberal than they thought or because they were always, with exceptions, the Peruvian right conservative, and generally patrimonial mercantilist, who enjoys economic freedom but political freedom neglects or ruthlessly slaughtered.

As 20 years ago, lost the opportunity to generate a proper motion emancipated from economic power, located in society and not just the managers. At that time, a small liberal group was worth the side of freedom and MVLL while most enlisted in the authoritarian and anti-politics. Some castaways reliberalizaron that generation, but the rest continued their journey.

Now MVLL with ethical liberalism, the liberalism can only triggers a new diaspora. It is sad that, just as it is strange that the decade democratic parties, but did not produce anti-party, our strong market produces so few liberals.

Taken Republic

Updated:

Here a note of José Alejandro Godoy surprise layoffs on Canal N and the shift of Trade group to the Fujimori.

What Does Watery Cervical Mucus Mean

Church and State: AROUND THE ETHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SEPARATION *

Gonzalo Gamio Gehri

The separation between religious institutions and state is one of the most important achievements of liberal culture, a principle that has been placed correctly in the political ideology of democracy. The policy expresses philosophical formulation of this thesis XVII century and responds to the tragic historical experience of religious wars in Europe. John Locke stated clearly that the state will correspond to protect the freedoms and rights of citizens, but in any case ensure the correct religious people: if God exists, if one person or many, is a matter that concerns the believer's faith and his thinking skills, and interests the individual himself or organizations in which the individual has chosen to participate. No one can force human beings to save their souls is a matter of conscience and personal freedom.

Since then it is considered that the state should guarantee religious tolerance and the right of everyone to believe or not believe in a free society, open to all faiths, and willing to provide spaces for dialogue and debate about the source of meaning in life (in a key religious and secular). It thus seeks to eradicate religious persecution - so common in premodern communities - where they are supposed to be a responsible leader should ensure the salvation of the souls of his subjects. institutions as the Inquisition unfortunate or dire measures such as removal of idolatry were permanently disabled. Over time, the liberal state itself was designed to "neutral" in religious matters - or rather, committed to ethical pluralism and respect for religious diversity - so that no position for or Contrary to some belief, provided it operates within the framework of respect for the law. In this perspective, in a liberal democratic society and there is no "official religion." Declaring a commitment, sympathy particular or special relationship with any religion would carry an unacceptable discrimination between citizens, that no exceptions should be treated as free and equal.

Separation Church / State seeks to prevent the politicization of faith as much as the sacralization of politics, and its pernicious effects on the public sphere. It is an expression of respect for the unique power of people to discern discuss and choose their beliefs and life plans. Sometimes the religious right have suggested that measures such as these contribute to undermine the "sense of transcendence 'between people and promote a kind of" spiritual retreat. " Slip the idea that this kind of position you have to minimize the place of religion in people's lives. Quite the contrary. Liberal separation recognizes the great value of religion for many people, so it proposes that citizens should have a space of freedom to discuss that value, reflect on what you assign meaning to life, and cultivar (if so choose) genuine faith practices. State coercion only severely damage the reflection and arbitrarily impose a single catalog of beliefs.

hold that space of faith is beyond the scope of influence of the state is not "privatization of faith." It is essential that people find places that can be rigorously and honestly discuss the points of divergence and where different faiths in an atmosphere of tolerance and open dialogue to other reasons. These social settings are available in their own religious communities and institutions of civil society. University, for example, is an important space for meditation on the academic value of interreligious dialogue, prevention of fanaticism and the role of multiple confessions in the foundation of a "global ethic" to use the felicitous phrase of Hans Küng. Argue that these places are off-state is not to advocate a kind of atomization of faith.

In Peru, the path towards the affirmation of a culture of separation between Church and State is still long. For example, the existence of a Concordat with the Holy See which states that public schools be taught a course in Catholic catechesis is inconsistent with what we are saying. In a truly secular state, such a course does not exist in public schools, religious education because it is the responsibility of families and parishes. Or, if it exists, it is a course in the history of religions (a course on the 'fact' religious), not a subject of an apologetic. Consolidate the separation in our country - for the sake of politics and for the sake of religion - democracy is a task that should be taken seriously.

* A corrected version of this brief text will be published in the journal Exchange.