The report called Black Book of Pelli Tower Urban analysis is primarily the initiative process, management, planning processing, the granting of permission and construction of an extremely singular our city of Seville. And not only for its height, which may seem the most striking (178 m) but above all, by all the irregularities of all kinds have been noticed in administrative sectional charge.
The document, presented its conclusions, was written by José García-Tapial, who was Chief of Urban Planning of the Urban Planning Department of Sevilla and Dean of the College of Architects, FernandoMendoza, National Award for Conservation and Restoration 2008, Francisco Morilla, architects and sociologists, as well as the Geographer Fenández Victor Salinas, Vice President of ICOMOS Spain.
The Black Book full Pelli Tower can DOWNLOAD HERE
Black Book conclusions Pelli Tower (pp. 88-91)
the final conclusions of this report must include, first in an overview of all irregularities and other circumstances sufficient detail along the same, and secondly the approach of a series of questions and unknowns into the past, present and future of this urban intervention.
Regarding the former, it has been argued and sufficiently demonstrated that the Cajasol Skyscrapers:
- goes against the "spirit" of the General Plan of Seville, especially with regard to respect for the consolidated city, its types and its landscape
- also violates the provisions by the General Plan in his Report on Sustainability and Mobility.
- violates the letter of the General Plan, especially the articles concerning the maximum height allowed, to harmonize with the environment, the definition of the types specified by him, the distribution of uses and the maximum buildable area.
- His figure urban (PERI) is clearly inadequate for what is pretending
- contradicts the Plan with respect Geenral to the following:
- the types of building
-
Areas Ordinances - the distribution of uses for the information document
- respect for the environment with the indiscriminate felling of trees
- the wording of the Special Plan
-
heights - the limits of the Special Plan
itself - the maximum floor area specified in the General Plan
- document is very incomplete technically by its:
documentary deficiencies - lack of Planning a Proposal
- The uncertainty of location
-
- regulatory gaps
- Its passage was incorrect and "misleading" by:
- The silence of the competent authorities
surprising
All these circumstances leads us to consider a series questions:
Why, if the Special Plan is primarily concerned with ordering a piece of property, with recognized technical and economic capacity, he has not read it but the Planning Department?
Why give the impression that the Skyline has more supporters in the City that in itself Cajasol?
Why the Special Plan is pending while the General Plan if they so different? What if they were not, why not include that in it?
Why will increase the buildable graciously Cajasol if you build a tower over 100 meters?
Who came the idea of \u200b\u200ba skyscraper?
Why is the City Council drafted a special plan which repeatedly concealed the construction of the Tower? Why
or the municipal proposal to the plenary, or in the Press advertisement in the Official Gazettes and referred to the Tower if this is the most significant Special Plan?
Why is the City Council drafted a special plan as incomplete before having a "quality proposal?
Why the Special Plan does not include the impact study required by the Act and the General Plan?
Why City Hall is quick to offer to occupy much of the Tower with the Urban Planning?
Why Management is willing to change the development in "horizontal" in their offices, one in "vertical" much more inefficient, expensive and less sustainable? Why
City Council rushed through final YOUR without waiting Special Plan mandatory reports of the Directorate General of Coasts, neither the Ministry of Public Works of the Junta of Andalusia? "Afraid some of these reports?
Why the Cultural Office of the Government of Andalusia in its favorable report of the Special Plan , makes no reference to an element so unusual and unique as the Tower, "with shoe stuck between 3 BICs?
Why not be asked to report on possible AENA air traffic conditions? Why
the same day reported adversely License Manager is quick to grant it? Why
which authorizes the City shops and offices on first and second basement prohibited in the General Plan?
Why not requested permission to fell 461 trees?
Why have hidden more than 600 trees removed?
Why the City violated international commitments, and referred the project to UNESCO?
Why is the City Council and the Board refused to comply with the requirements of the UNESCO at its meeting in Seville, and do not paralyze them provisionally as required? Why
City Council appoints as his representative in the State Commission that studied the issue, a technician linked to the promotion "Puerto Triana" from the start?
Why, in a recent article published in the press by the Director of the General Plan Drafting Team, Manuel Ángel González Fustegueras on board, he talks about:
An approach that tries to save at all costs the interests of a few , wasting the heritage of all. What almost always try the powerful and their cronies. " Do you speak only of tables?
Is there a relationship between the construction of the Tower and the unexpected offer of negotiations with the current owners of Tablada, formerly owned by Cajasol? Too many questions
to clear.
Final consideration
Throughout this report we have highlighted the irregularities and breaches of both Community law as more serious provisions Cajasol skyscrapers. We entered the thorny issue of land ownership and why the Planning Department prepared a Special Plan on some private land. Nor have we wanted to make an assessment "aesthetic" or "architectural" the building, because all the aspects we have discussed are PREVIOUS these issues "taste."
The skyscraper is illegal Cajasol "ugly" or "nice." is not a matter of taste. Nor is it a problem of some "romantic nostalgic trying to preserve the landscape of Seville. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A cluster of irregular and illegal IMPROPER INTEGRATED RULE OF LAW IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
If the competent authorities and the courts are " looking elsewhere " and the skyscraper is built, will invalidate all legal regulations PLANNING, ASSET PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPES OF THE SPANISH. The skyscraper Cajasol or Pelli Tower will become a symbol of barbarity, arrogance and contempt of the laws of ANDALUCIA SPAIN AND AS WELL AS INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS SIGNED BY THE SPANISH.
"The dependence of real estate investment is the main cause of political corruption" Manuel Castells, Professor of Sociology and Urban Planning at the University of Berkeley.
Platform against the construction of skyscrapers Cajasol.
Sevilla.
January 2010 
0 comments:
Post a Comment