Gonzalo Gamio Gehri
Steven Levitsky's phrase about the terrible dilemma of second round has hit the nail. About Humala have doubts about Keiko, tests. Martha Chavez's statements on threats sliding César San Martín and the noting that the families of the victims of
The dismissal of two journalists from Canal N to enable the editorial line of this medium to support the return of Fujimori (in convergence with the conservative view has been gradually imposed the new administration Trade ) goes in this direction. IPYS and has spoken negatively about this decision violates the freedom of journalistic work. This is a shame, especially if we remember the important commitment made by the Canal N to the defense of democracy as it was the first medium to meet the citizen marches against the authoritarian regime of the pair Fujimori - Montesinos and post the video Kouri - Montesinos.
Statements of Mario Vargas Llosa about his decision to vote for Ollanta Humala has generated harsh and strange reactions. His daughter Morgan has reported being the victim of threats ("Coming from what political sector? The same group, perhaps, who attacked the memorial The crying eye?). Vargas Llosa has received countless subtle little criticism from politicians, businessmen and journalists increasingly coming to Fujimori, as Jose Barba Caballero, Julio Favre or Aldo Mariátegui. The latest to join this choir is Juan Luis Cipriani (not surprising when we remember their former sympathies Fujimori). For his part, Delgado Aparicio deplorable has written an article, full of bad intentions and qualifications against the person of Vargas Llosa. Trelles, beating and relatively more cautious, have been accused of intolerance writer, curiously, the new spokesman for Fujimori has stated in an interview that the eventual victory of Humala would seriously endanger the freedom of press and expression, when the rate of Fujimori bought consciences and editorial lines of different media, and pursued independent journalism, as has been demonstrated, the interviewer's reply was sung, but Raul Vargas said nothing.
The Fujimori bet because people do not report on what we live for some years. That we forget crimes against life and the common good, that we forget many dark paths. invite us to disregard the facts. Or that we are completely complacent with past evil and degrading civic. Some even evoke the past in a notoriously crooked: see a recent really unusual Federico Prieto Celi article in fa vor of the candidate puts Fujimori where highly controversial figures as Carlos Bologna, Jorge Camet and Juan Carlos Hurtado Miller as a kind of model of "democratic modernization." of Ripley.
crimes committed since fujimorato and are thoroughly documented. Alberto Fujimori was convicted of murder and his sentence has been ratified. The environment of the candidacy of his daughter is the same that surrounded those in power in the nineties can we close our eyes to that reality? Can we put in parentheses the principles and values \u200b\u200bthat this regime trampled on behalf of a hypothetical ' effectiveness' in the future management of the economy? These are questions that we should avoid making when we meditate on how to vote.
Updated : Article Fujimori and sewer dweller (The Mule).
Update 2: A cardinal is very orange (Augusto Alvarez Rodrich).
,
0 comments:
Post a Comment