Tapial JOSE GARCIA-MENDOZA FERNANDO LEÓN and CASTELLS , architects
The recent visit to the city of the national heads of ICOMOS and WMF has brought back to present different economic irregularities , procedural and planning that have come together throughout the entire process of pregnancy, and administrative handling of such controversial building construction. We will try to synthesize the specific urban development in the most intelligible as possible. To your knowledge, it appears that you are producing a general failure of the most significant parameters General Plan urban development (built, uses, types, heights, facilities, green spaces, etc). Read More
This distortion of the General Plan is being made possible by two urban documents processed on different dates: first, the Special Plan DT.10.Puerto PERI-Triana, prepared by the Planning Department itself and, subsequently, subsequent planning permission granted to different phases of the building.
The data below relate to the study were obtained from administrative records for these documents. It was not easy access to them, seeing obliged to require under the administrative jurisdiction so that we facilitate. Now let us see one by one these parameters.
1 .- buildable. It is most important from the standpoint of profit only. Is the one that establishes what can be built and, therefore, market. The General Plan sets a floor area of \u200b\u200b68,000 m2 for profitable uses. The licenses allow the construction of 89791.02 m2. Describe the "engineering" used for this "multiplication of square meters," alone would consume all the space in this article. 2.-
Uses. The General Plan for this area provided basic and mostly use commercial: 48,000 m2 would be of commercial use, and a maximum of 20,000 m2 for other uses (entertainment, hotels, offices, etc). The license granted permits only 9310.33 m2 of commercial use, however, 80,480.69 m2 of office space.
3 .- Height . The General Plan states that the height not included in plans, as is the case, "a harmonization of the morphology and types of environment." In the Monastery is 6 plants, and Triana 3. It has projected a 38-storey building .
4 .- Type . All constructs provided by the General Plan must belong some of the types defined in it (apple closed, open building, garden city, etc) and laying down special conditions. The type "tower" does not exist in the General Plan, and therefore there are special conditions for it. It is, therefore, a type of building outside the General Plan, and contrary to it.
5 .- Green Spaces .- The General Plan in this area requires an allocation of 84,064 m2 of parkland. The municipal PERI, however, only 66,098 m2 reserve. To cover this counts as significant reduction (?) Of 17,996 m2 Navigation Pavilion and Green Zone
.(¡!!!!)
6 .- equipment. The General Plan sets the local allocation of SIPS (Services Public Interest and Social) in 12,592 m2. PERI is reduced to 10,684 m2 . This reduction and green areas are intended to increase the lucrative parcel area where the tower is located.
7 .- The nature of the equipment . The General Plan establishes them as Local Amenities ", while the PERI defined as" General System ". The difference between the two big consideration is economics: the "Local Provisions" must be borne entirely by the developer, while that "general systems" have to be by all those involved in the area around the General Plan. The latter deficiency, together with the previous two, have already been noticed and reported by the Architect of the delegation in Seville of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport, in its report of March 19, 2007. Report not taken into account by the Council. One could argue
many breaches of the General Plan and zoning laws and administrative identified and developed in the lawsuit against the granting of licenses currently takes place before the administrative courts, but these data serve for better understanding public.
The data below relate to the study were obtained from administrative records for these documents. It was not easy access to them, seeing obliged to require under the administrative jurisdiction so that we facilitate. Now let us see one by one these parameters.
1 .- buildable. It is most important from the standpoint of profit only. Is the one that establishes what can be built and, therefore, market. The General Plan sets a floor area of \u200b\u200b68,000 m2 for profitable uses. The licenses allow the construction of 89791.02 m2. Describe the "engineering" used for this "multiplication of square meters," alone would consume all the space in this article. 2.-
Uses. The General Plan for this area provided basic and mostly use commercial: 48,000 m2 would be of commercial use, and a maximum of 20,000 m2 for other uses (entertainment, hotels, offices, etc). The license granted permits only 9310.33 m2 of commercial use, however, 80,480.69 m2 of office space.
3 .- Height . The General Plan states that the height not included in plans, as is the case, "a harmonization of the morphology and types of environment." In the Monastery is 6 plants, and Triana 3. It has projected a 38-storey building .
4 .- Type . All constructs provided by the General Plan must belong some of the types defined in it (apple closed, open building, garden city, etc) and laying down special conditions. The type "tower" does not exist in the General Plan, and therefore there are special conditions for it. It is, therefore, a type of building outside the General Plan, and contrary to it.
5 .- Green Spaces .- The General Plan in this area requires an allocation of 84,064 m2 of parkland. The municipal PERI, however, only 66,098 m2 reserve. To cover this counts as significant reduction (?) Of 17,996 m2 Navigation Pavilion and Green Zone
.(¡!!!!)
6 .- equipment. The General Plan sets the local allocation of SIPS (Services Public Interest and Social) in 12,592 m2. PERI is reduced to 10,684 m2 . This reduction and green areas are intended to increase the lucrative parcel area where the tower is located.
7 .- The nature of the equipment . The General Plan establishes them as Local Amenities ", while the PERI defined as" General System ". The difference between the two big consideration is economics: the "Local Provisions" must be borne entirely by the developer, while that "general systems" have to be by all those involved in the area around the General Plan. The latter deficiency, together with the previous two, have already been noticed and reported by the Architect of the delegation in Seville of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport, in its report of March 19, 2007. Report not taken into account by the Council. One could argue
many breaches of the General Plan and zoning laws and administrative identified and developed in the lawsuit against the granting of licenses currently takes place before the administrative courts, but these data serve for better understanding public.
0 comments:
Post a Comment